Continuity equation validation for nonhomogeneous traffic

All authors:
Tiwari, G., Fazio, J., Gaurav, S., Chatteerjee, N.
Host organisation: CoE New Delhi, India
Publication year: 2008
Published in:
Journal of Transportation Engineering‐ASCE 134, 118‐127.
Research theme: Management and Control
Keywords:
traffic models, traffic speed, traffic flow, traffic engineering
Type:
Research article
Summary:
The continuity equation involving traffic flow expresses the relationship between density, flow, and speed. Density equals the flow divided by space mean speed. The formulation of this equation in the year 1952 has two important assumptions. One assumption is that spacing and speed are constant, i.e., uncongested conditions with moderate to slightly high volumes. The other assumption is that homogeneous traffic prevails, vehicle composition is uniform and vehicles behave within strict lane discipline rules. To determine if the continuity equation is valid under nonhomogeneous traffic conditions, one performs an experiment involving data collection of density, flow, and speed at three midblock sites in India. Data collection occurred when uncongested conditions prevailed with moderate to slightly high volumes. Comparing the average density derived from observed densities in the field to the density derived from the continuity equation reveals whether or not the continuity equation accurately predicts average density under nonhomogeneous traffic conditions. Similar traffic operating characteristics served as the basis for grouping vehicles into five traffic entity types. The association between average density based on observed densities of nonhomogeneous traffic and density derived from the continuity equation had a correlation coefficient of +0.88 for light, four-wheeler type, +0.85 for heavy vehicle type, +0.90 for motorized, three-wheeler type, +0.83 for motorized, two-wheeler type, and +0.50 for nonmotorized, two- and three-wheeler type. Additionally, a nonparametric test, i.e., Wilcoxon signed-rank test, compared observed and derived densities. At a 95% confidence level, no significant difference existed between observed and derived densities of light four-wheeler type, heavy vehicle type, motorized two-wheeler type, nonmotorized two- and three-wheeler type, and between cumulative observed and cumulative derived density. Only in the case of the motorized three-wheeler type, the  observed, and derived densities are significantly different. These moderate to strong correlations coupled with the results of the nonparametric test validate the application of the continuity equation when traffic is nonhomogeneous.
August 2018
Upcoming Events
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
v31      1 2 3 4 5
v32  6 7 8 9 10 11 12
v33  13 14 15 16 17 18 19
v34  20 21 22 23 24 25 26
v35  27 28 29 30 31    

The VREF invites PhD students and early stage researchers to apply for a Study Visit Grant to be supported with up to SEK 30 000.

The invitation is open until 181031.

Blog! Blog! Blog!

Global Mobility Research

This Meeting of the Minds' blog monthly releases interviews of global transportation researchers from the VREF's Future Urban Transport Program Network.

TheCityFix

This CityFix series, produced by the WRI (World Ressources Institute) Ross Center for Sustainable Cities and supported by the VREF, discusses walking and cycling in cities with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries.

Each year the Håkan Frisinger Foundation for Transportation Research awards a scholarship to a prominent researcher.

Read more...

About VREF

The Volvo Research and Educational Foundations (VREF) inspires, initiates and supports research and educational activities through the Future Urban Transport Programme - How to deal with the complexity of urban transport (FUT). 

Our Vision: Sustainable transport for equitable access in urban areas

Read more

© Copyright VREF
2018